137 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
137 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
### Streams Working Group
|
|
|
|
The Node.js Streams is jointly governed by a Working Group
|
|
(WG)
|
|
that is responsible for high-level guidance of the project.
|
|
|
|
The WG has final authority over this project including:
|
|
|
|
* Technical direction
|
|
* Project governance and process (including this policy)
|
|
* Contribution policy
|
|
* GitHub repository hosting
|
|
* Conduct guidelines
|
|
* Maintaining the list of additional Collaborators
|
|
|
|
For the current list of WG members, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
|
|
|
|
### Collaborators
|
|
|
|
The readable-stream GitHub repository is
|
|
maintained by the WG and additional Collaborators who are added by the
|
|
WG on an ongoing basis.
|
|
|
|
Individuals making significant and valuable contributions are made
|
|
Collaborators and given commit-access to the project. These
|
|
individuals are identified by the WG and their addition as
|
|
Collaborators is discussed during the WG meeting.
|
|
|
|
_Note:_ If you make a significant contribution and are not considered
|
|
for commit-access log an issue or contact a WG member directly and it
|
|
will be brought up in the next WG meeting.
|
|
|
|
Modifications of the contents of the readable-stream repository are
|
|
made on
|
|
a collaborative basis. Anybody with a GitHub account may propose a
|
|
modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project
|
|
Collaborators. All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a
|
|
Collaborator with sufficient expertise who is able to take full
|
|
responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed
|
|
by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required
|
|
for sign-off. Consensus should be sought if additional Collaborators
|
|
participate and there is disagreement around a particular
|
|
modification. See _Consensus Seeking Process_ below for further detail
|
|
on the consensus model used for governance.
|
|
|
|
Collaborators may opt to elevate significant or controversial
|
|
modifications, or modifications that have not found consensus to the
|
|
WG for discussion by assigning the ***WG-agenda*** tag to a pull
|
|
request or issue. The WG should serve as the final arbiter where
|
|
required.
|
|
|
|
For the current list of Collaborators, see the project
|
|
[README.md](./README.md#members).
|
|
|
|
### WG Membership
|
|
|
|
WG seats are not time-limited. There is no fixed size of the WG.
|
|
However, the expected target is between 6 and 12, to ensure adequate
|
|
coverage of important areas of expertise, balanced with the ability to
|
|
make decisions efficiently.
|
|
|
|
There is no specific set of requirements or qualifications for WG
|
|
membership beyond these rules.
|
|
|
|
The WG may add additional members to the WG by unanimous consensus.
|
|
|
|
A WG member may be removed from the WG by voluntary resignation, or by
|
|
unanimous consensus of all other WG members.
|
|
|
|
Changes to WG membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be
|
|
suggested as any other agenda item (see "WG Meetings" below).
|
|
|
|
If an addition or removal is proposed during a meeting, and the full
|
|
WG is not in attendance to participate, then the addition or removal
|
|
is added to the agenda for the subsequent meeting. This is to ensure
|
|
that all members are given the opportunity to participate in all
|
|
membership decisions. If a WG member is unable to attend a meeting
|
|
where a planned membership decision is being made, then their consent
|
|
is assumed.
|
|
|
|
No more than 1/3 of the WG members may be affiliated with the same
|
|
employer. If removal or resignation of a WG member, or a change of
|
|
employment by a WG member, creates a situation where more than 1/3 of
|
|
the WG membership shares an employer, then the situation must be
|
|
immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more WG
|
|
members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s).
|
|
|
|
### WG Meetings
|
|
|
|
The WG meets occasionally on a Google Hangout On Air. A designated moderator
|
|
approved by the WG runs the meeting. Each meeting should be
|
|
published to YouTube.
|
|
|
|
Items are added to the WG agenda that are considered contentious or
|
|
are modifications of governance, contribution policy, WG membership,
|
|
or release process.
|
|
|
|
The intention of the agenda is not to approve or review all patches;
|
|
that should happen continuously on GitHub and be handled by the larger
|
|
group of Collaborators.
|
|
|
|
Any community member or contributor can ask that something be added to
|
|
the next meeting's agenda by logging a GitHub Issue. Any Collaborator,
|
|
WG member or the moderator can add the item to the agenda by adding
|
|
the ***WG-agenda*** tag to the issue.
|
|
|
|
Prior to each WG meeting the moderator will share the Agenda with
|
|
members of the WG. WG members can add any items they like to the
|
|
agenda at the beginning of each meeting. The moderator and the WG
|
|
cannot veto or remove items.
|
|
|
|
The WG may invite persons or representatives from certain projects to
|
|
participate in a non-voting capacity.
|
|
|
|
The moderator is responsible for summarizing the discussion of each
|
|
agenda item and sends it as a pull request after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
### Consensus Seeking Process
|
|
|
|
The WG follows a
|
|
[Consensus
|
|
Seeking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making)
|
|
decision-making model.
|
|
|
|
When an agenda item has appeared to reach a consensus the moderator
|
|
will ask "Does anyone object?" as a final call for dissent from the
|
|
consensus.
|
|
|
|
If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus a WG member can call for
|
|
either a closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next
|
|
meeting. The call for a vote must be seconded by a majority of the WG
|
|
or else the discussion will continue. Simple majority wins.
|
|
|
|
Note that changes to WG membership require a majority consensus. See
|
|
"WG Membership" above.
|